QQC 1:
Quote: "Plain talk about actual foodstuff--the committee had advised Americans to "reduce combustion of meat"--was replaced by artful compromise: "choose meats, poultry, and fish that will reduce saturated fat intake."
Question: The question this brings up in my head is, Why do we let industries like the red meat and dairy industries or any others filter the way we look at their products?
Comment: I think that it is very wrong for the United States of America public to have filtered outlooks upon certain things. It is wrong that the industries have the ability to control the way we view their own products. I feel as though it would make more sense to have no filter and just listen to what both sides of a controversy have to say. In this passage it clearly shows that scientists discovered red meats and dairy products are not good for us, but the industries criticized them enough to the point where a second report was filed making the discovery more general and about nutrients instead of foods. This way we wouldn't know what specific foods to watch out for, and we would continue to help industries make a lot of money by buying their unhealthy food.
QQC 2:
Quote: "If foods are understood only in terms of the various quantities of nutrients they contain, even processed foods may be considered to be 'healthier' for you than whole foods if they contain the appropriate quantities of some nutrients."
Question: This makes me question whether or not nutritionism is really a good thing or not.
Comment: Logically, this passage makes a lot of sense. And most things in my life have been based on logic so I must believe it. Technically, we could just create all of our own foods to contain the exact nutrients we need, we could even just get everything we need through pills. But is this really what is right? Obviously plants and animals were here for us to eat, there is a reason we require food to survive, and is the reason purely just based on nutrients in food? There was obviously a time when nutrients weren't a thing, and food was just food. I personally feel as though this time would have been much healthier than where we are at in life now with nutrients.
QQC 3:
Quote: "Industry hated the imitation rule."
Question: Are nutrients truly about the health of the American public, or is it more for the money of the industry?
Comment: Here we are again with the industry running things. Now the industry changed the laws so that the foods they created by hand cannot be viewed as unnaturally created foods. Now they are viewed to be as normal as a plant we would pick out of the ground. Clearly this is something that is bad and unhealthy for the American public, but it ended up happening. It is obvious that it happened so the the industry could make more money. I think this is very unacceptable because it is essentially trading the health of the American public for money to be given out to a very small group of people.
QQC 4:
Quote: "That's why when the Atkins diet storm hit the food industry in 2003, bread and pasta got a quick redesign (dialing back the cards; boosting the proteins)… ….Who would ever buy imitation spaghetti? But of course that is precisely what low-carb pasta is."
Question: What else don't we know that the industry does know?
Comment: I honestly never knew that low-carb pasta was created by man to fit a trend of society. I never even really thought about the fact that pasta and breads are created by scientists to contain anything they think we 'need'. But do we really need it? Or is everything we are eating do to a trend in society and what is popular at the moment?
QQC 5:
Quote: "At the behest of government panels, nutrition scientists, and public health officials, we have dramatically changed the way we eat and the way we think about food, in what stands as the biggest experiment in applied nutritionist history."
Question: Why are we letting ourselves be controlled?
Comment: I am surprised at this point that people aren't making a bigger deal about the way the government and industry are control our food sources. I know they are fighting the industries through lobbying and politics, and there are smaller private organizations used to build awareness, but I feel as though this is something that should be blowing up a lot bigger.
QQC 6:
Quote: "As I write, the FDA has just signed off on a new healthier claim for Frito-Lay chips on the grounds that eating chips fried in polyunsaturated fats can help you reduce your consumption of saturated fats, thereby conferring blessings on your cardiovascular system. So a notorious junk for pass through the needle eye of nutritionist logic and come out the other side looking like a health food."
Question: Why aren't we as the public more self conscious about the subject of food?
Comment: Although it is obvious the food industry and government are a huge part in why Americans are fat, and why we eat unhealthily, but shouldn't we watch ourselves and each other more? There is really no excuse for the way that we know we treat ourselves, and when it comes down to it I think it falls into our own laps to be healthy.